当前世界环境

Introduction

The industrial effluents may contain one or more of the contaminants like high suspended solids, oil, high dissolved solids, high residual chlorine and pH value outside the permitted range.¹There are many human-originated impacts that degrade the water and decrease its quality, with direct and indirect effects on the water courses. The industries are a source of punctual pollution with considerable impacts on the hydric resources, due to diversity in the composition of the effluents.²

Waste from the industry, which is subjected to reaction with percolating rain water and reaches the ground water level. This percolating water picks up a large number of contaminants and reaches the aquifer system and hence degrades the ground water quality.³Disposal of treated & untreated industrial effluents on land has become a regular practice for some industries. Industries located in Mettupalayam taluk, Tamilnadu dispose their effluents on land and the farmers of the adjacent farmlands have complained that their shallow open wells get polluted & also the salt content of soil has started building up slowly.⁴The fluoride concentration in water of BALCO, Korba area (India) varied from 1.07 ppm to 3.10 ppm causing dental and skeletal fluorosis in that area.⁵马拉维的一项研究进行了评估tent of chemical pollution in area as affected by industrial effluents. Both the effluents and the water at selected parameter were analysed for pH₁dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, electrical conductivity, suspended solids, nitrates, alkalinity, hardness, chloride and phosphate in the dry seasons. The results showed that the effluents were acidic in both the dry season (range: 4.2 ± 0.02 – 6.5 ± 0.02) and in the rainy season (range; 4.2 ± 0.05 – 5.6 ± 0.01).⁶周围的地下水the salt pans has been found with the high concentration of TDS, Chloride and Sodium.⁷

In view of above, the Physico-chemical study of industrial effluents and groundwater of Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur was carried out during monsoon season and the results are discussed here.

Material and Methods

The samples were collected at the discharge points of different industries while mixed effluent samples were taken from the points where this mixed effluent is discharged into the nearby drain (nala). The industrial effluents of 4 textile industries, 4 pharmaceuticals industries, 4 printing industries, 4 food products industries, 3 samples of mixed effluents and underground water samples were collected at both sites of the nala and nearby different industries. Samples were collected in sterilized bottles. These were systematically analysed. The analysis of these samples were carried out using standard methods.8,9

Table 1: The following instruments were used for analysis 点击这里查看表

While chloride, alkalinity, hardness, dissolved oxygen and COD were determined by using titrimetric method, TDS and Suspended solids were determined by gravimetric method. Details of analysis are given in Table-2.

Results and Discussion

Industrial Effluents: Table-3 pH

A quick evaluation of acidic and alkaline nature of water can be done by the determination of pH which is an important parameter of wather.¹⁰The pH value i.e. 6.3 – 8.6 were found to be under permitted limit of Industrial Effluent Standards.¹¹

Electrical Conductivity

The value of electrical conductivity ranged from 1 to 3.3.

Total Dissolved Solids

TDS values varied from 680 to 2142 mg/ L. Which is under permitted limit as per Industrial Effluent Standards.¹¹

Table 2: Parameters and methods employed in the chemical examination of samples 点击这里查看表

Total Suspended Solids

Total Suspended Solids were found in the range of 1.6 to 860.6 mg/L, 240 mg/L of textile industry, 860.6 mg/L of pharmaceuticals industry, 312, 408 and 810 mg/L of printing industries and 160.8, 178 and 230 of food products industries are at higher side as per Industrial Effluent Standards. It should be < 150 mg/L.

Chloride

Chloride value varied from 120.26 to 905.5 mg/L.

Total Alkalinity

Total alkalinity was noted from 200 to 1560 ppm. After data analysis, it is found that alkalinity of 1 pharmaceuticals effluent, 3 food products effluents and 1 mixed effluent are above 1000 ppm.

Sodium and Potassium

The value of sodium and potassium were in the range of 200-795 ppm and 4-55 ppm.

Nitrate

The nitrate values were found from 0.8 to 20 mg/L. The nitrate value are under permitted limit.

Sulphate

The sulphate value varied between 26 to 210 mg/L. The value of sulphate of some effluents like 1 textile, 2 printing and 4 food products are above 100 mg/L.

Table 3: Result of analysis of Industrial effluents during monsoon season 2007 点击这里查看表

Dissolved Oxygen

It’s value were noted from 0.4 - 4.8 mg/L. The dissolved oxygen in some effluents is absent as per result.

Chemical Oxygen Demand

化学需氧量值是110to 710 mg/L. Some are in the higher range as per Industrial Effluent Standards.¹¹The value of COD should not exceed 400 mg/L.

Hardness

Hardness found to be from 126 to 420 mg/L.

Phosphorus

The value of phosphorus varied between 1 to 28 mg/L.

Fluoride

The value of fluoride was noted from negligible to 2.86 mg/L.

Under Ground Water: Table-4

表4: Result of analysis of underground water during monsoon season 2007 点击这里查看表

pH

The pH values were found to be from 7.16 to 9.52. All the pH values are under permissible limit as per Indian Standard and WHO guideline except one i.e. 9.52.

Electrical Conductivity

The value of electrical conductivity ranged from 1.08 to 3.3 mmhos/cm. The variation in electrical conductivity could be explained to the natural concentration of ions present in water. The higher values of conductance (>1000µmhos/cm) may be due to the difference in geographical features.¹²

Total Dissolved Solids

TDS values varied from 658.4 to 2130 mg/ L. This is under permissible limit as per Indian Standard except two i.e. 2130 and 2030.6 mg/L. The samples have TDS above 500 mg/L but below the maximum permissible limit of 1500 mg/L which can be used for domestic purposes. But if utilized for cooking purposes, the water has a salty taste and produces scales on cooking vessels.¹⁰

Chloride

Chloride values varied from 106.5 to 960.9 mg/L. The Chloride of few samples are above the desirable limit but below the permissible limit as per Indian Standard. Chloride is one of the important parameters to know the quality of water. High chloride causes cardiovascular problems, gives a bitter taste to water, corrodes steel and affects the solidity and strength of concret.¹³

Total Alkalinity

Total alkalinity of few samples are above permissible limit.

Sodium and Potassium

The values of sodium and potassium wre in the range of 68-886 ppm and 0.62 -40.62 ppm. The value of sodium of mostly all samples above WHO guideline i.e. 200 mg/L except few samples.

Nitrate

The nitrate values were found from 2.8 to 36 mg/L. The nitrate values are under desirable limit as per Indian standard i.e. 45 mg/L.

Sulphate

The sulphate values varied between 21.68 to 362 mg/L. The value of sulphate of all samples under permissible limit as per Indian Standard and WHO i.e. M400 mg/L.

Dissolved Oxygen

It’s values were noted from 2.6 to 9.8 mg/ L. Do as a parameter is very useful for assessing the quality of water and providing a check on pollution.¹⁰

Hardness

Hardness found to be from 120 to 405 mg/ L. The hardness of water samples are under permissible limit as per IS and WHO guideline. Hardness may be due to the ground water receiving calcium and magnesium rich minerals leached from rocks and other deposits like limestone, gypsum and clay minerals. Sewage and domestic wastes are also important sources of total hardness in ground water.¹⁴

Phosphorus

The values of phosphorus varied between negligible to 3.5 mg/L.

Fluoride

The values of fluoride were noted from 0.12 to 2.42 mg/L. The value of fluoride of some water samples are above the permissible limit as per BIS & WHO guideline.

Conclusion

The industrial effluents data indicate, that the pH and TDS are under permitted limit but TSS and COD of few effluent samples are at higher side in the industrial effluents. Effluents should not be discharged into nearby water bodies or in soil without treatment. The results of underground water indicate, that the value of some parameters of few samples are at higher side, which may be due to seepage of effluent. So the underground water of SIA should be used for drinking purpose after treatment.

Acknowledgements

We are highly grateful to Dr. H.C. Pande, Vice Chancellor Emeritus, BIT and Director BIT Extension Centre, Jaipur for continued encouragement, helpful suggestions and providing necessary facilities.

References

1. Shandilya P., Phogat S.S., Mahal G.S., Balagi S., Bhartiay S.,BHEL Journal, (2006) 27(2): 45-45.
2. Abrahao. R., C. Monica, Lucia C., Gadelha M., International Conference on Energy,Environment and Disasters-INCEED., Charlotte, N.C., USA-July (2005) 24-30.
3. Tyadi P., Buddi D., Choudhary R., Sawhney R.L., A Review,Pollution Research, (2000) 19(3): 443-445.
4. Mukhergee, S. and Nelliyat P., This paper has been presented at the IWMI-TATA waterpolicy program’s 5^thAnnual Partners Research Meet, held during March 8-10, at the Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA), Gujarat & also awarded as the best “Yong Scientist Award for the year 2006”.
5. Sahu A. and Vaishnav M.M.,Journal ofEnvironmental Science and Engineering(2006) 48(1): 65-68.
6. Phiri O., Munba P., Moya B.H.Z. & Kadewa W.,International Journal of EnvironmentScience & Technology(ISSN: p-ISSN: 1-Nub3).
7. Tripathi J.K. & Panig Ray R.C.,PollutionResearch,(1998) 17(2): 157-161.
8. ‘APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water’ American Public Health Association,Washington D.C. 20^thed New York (1998).
9. HLS Tondon, Method of Analysis of soils, plants, waters and fertilizers. Fertilizers Development and Consultation Organisation, New Delhi, India, 144+vi (1995).
10. Anandhaparameswari N., Hemalatha, S., Vidhyalakshmi G.S. and Shakunthala K.,Nature Environment and Pollution Technology,(2007) 6(2): 333-334.
11. http://f2check.rediff.com//bn/donwload.cgi/ PCD_Water_Quality_Standards..../htm.
12. Kataria, H.C. and Jain O.P.,Indian Journalof Environmental Protection,(1995) 5: 569-571.
13. Guru Prasad, B.Nature Environment andPollution Technology,(2003) 2(2): 173-178.
14. Mishra S.R. and Saxena D.N.,PollutionResearch(1989)8(2): 77-86.