• google scholor
  • Views: 2141

  • PDF Downloads: 207

Controlling technologies of SO2 by adsorption techniques

D. Sirisha1and K. Mukkanti1*

1Centre for Environment, IST, JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad India

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.2.13

The present studies deals with the adsorption of SO2by manganese oxide i.e., Pyrulusite ore. Pyrulusite is used as an adsorbent for the present studies. It is found that the percentage removal of SO2increases with the increase in contact time, follows first order kinetics and a unimolecular layer is formed during the process. The percentage removal of SO2increases with increase in dosages and decreases with increase in concentration. Thermodynamic parameters such as enthalpy, entropy and free energy of the process were determined which indicates that the process is spontaneous and exothermic in nature. The negative values of S indicate the increased randomness at the solid interface during the adsorption of SO2.


SO2; Adsorption Techniques; Pyrulusite

Copy the following to cite this article:

Sirisha D, Mukkanti K. Controlling technologies of SO2 by adsorption techniques. Curr World Environ 2006;(1):169-172 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.2.13

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Sirisha D, Mukkanti K. Controlling technologies of SO2 by adsorption techniques. Curr World Environ 2006;(1):169-172. Available from://www.a-i-l-s-a.com/?p=1028


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 2006-09-25
Accepted: 2006-11-11

Introduction

SO2and its derivatives produce strong irritation on the eyes and nasal passage ways. It causes intense irritation even at 2.5 ppm levels to the eyes and respiratory tract.1-3It is absorbed by the nasal system leading to swelling and stimulated mucus secretion and it causes lung cancer.4-6The accumulation of transport vehicles such as automobiles at the signal points on the main arteries of the city and the consequent emission of exhaust of considerable quantity is everyday sequence. So the present study deals with controlling technologies of SO2by batch adsorption by using MnO2as an adsorbent.

Methods and Materials

Selection of the Adsorbent

Manganese dioxide is selected as an adsorbent for the present studies. MnO2is amphertic in nature and it is a good oxidizing agent. It can easily to take an atom of oxygen. Due to the oxidizing nature of MnO2a reaction takes place between them. Taking that factor into consideration MnO2is selected as an adsorbent.

Figure - 1: Variation of contact time between MnO2and SO2
Click kere to view figure


The present studies are conducted by batch adsorption techniques. These methods are selected because SO2存在于低concentrations and it is noncombustible. The experiments are conducted with respect to contact time concentration, adsorbent dosage and with respect to temperature.

Experimental Procedure

Effect of Contact Time and Particle Size on Adsorption of SO2:

To study the effect of contact time, SO2gas diluted with N2gas is made to pass through a catalytic tube, which is maintained at a constant temperature. The catalytic tube is filled with a fixed amount of 0.8gms. The flow rate of 60 ml/min. was maintained. The experiments are conducted with 500mic. and 250mic. The results are shown in fig.1.

Figure - 2: Variation of
initial concentration

Click kere to view figure


Effect of Concentration

Different concentrations of SO2diluted with N2gas are made to pass through a catalytic tube, which consists a constant amount of MnO2. The concentration of the gas is determined before and after adsorption of SO2by using SO2analyzer. The experiments are conducted with respect to 250 MIC and 500 MIC particle size. The results are shown in fig.2

Figure - 3: Variation of
adsorbent dosages

Click kere to view figure


Effect of Adsorbent Dosages

To study the effect of MnO2dosages, definite concentration of SO2is made to pass through a catalytic tube which consists of adsorbent. The adsorbent dosages are varied and initial conc. of SO2and final conc. of SO2are determined by using SO2analyser which is based on west-Gaeke method. The results are shown in fig.3.

Figure - 4: Relationship between Log x/m and log Ce
Click kere to view figure


Effect of Temperature

To study the effect of temperature, the experiments are conducted at three different temperatures i.e., 450C, 650C and 850C.

Results and Discussion

Fig.1 shows that initially the percentage removal of SO2increases with the increase in contact time.7-8The optimum time for the removal of SO2is 20 min. The percentage removal of SO2increases with decrease in particle size.9-10The percentage removal of SO2increases with increase in contact time and it follows a smooth curve which indicates that the process is of first order.11Initially the adsorption capacity is practically proportional to contact time initially the MnO2surface is free from SO2once equilibrium is established adsorption no longer depends on the surface area.

Figure - 5: Relationship between 1/T and Ln K
Click kere to view figure


Fig.2 represents the percentage removal of SO2decreases with the increase in concentration.11-12The number of gas molecules will be low at low concentrations and at the higher concentrations the number of gas molecules is more so adsorption is less.

Fig.3 represents that the percentage removal of SO
2increases with the increase in adsorbent dosage . Greater the number of adsorbent sites, greater is the percentage of adsorption.

Fig.4 represents that adsorption process follows Freundlich adsorption isotherm.
15

It is observed the adsorption capacity increases with increase in temperature i.e., 850C. Thermodynamic parameters are calculated by plotting logkcverses 1/T.

A straight line is obtained. The negative 43, slope of the straight line indicates that the process of adsorption is exothermic in nature. The free energy of the process is negative which indicate that process is feasible and spontaneous in nature,


References

  1. Baskurt, O.K.,Environ.Health, (1988) 344-348.
  2. Bethal, RA., Epstein, J., and SheppardAm.Red. Respir. Dis.,(1983) 128.
  3. CiconeG, Faggiano F, Falasca PEpidermiolprev.,(1995) 19,99-104.
  4. Farone A,Haung S, Paulauskis J.Respir.cell/mol. Biol.(1995) 12,345-450.
  5. Fine, J.M,Gordon T, Sheppard, D.,Am. Rev.Respir Dis(1987) 136,1122-1126.
  6. Anzar U.T, Venel, T.G., Hackney J.D,Environ.Res.(1983) 30, 340.
  7. Al-Asheh, S., Banal,F and Al-Hameed,NAdsorption Sci. and Tech.,(2003) 21(2), 177-188.
  8. Lam, K., Car, X., Esenthal, R and Hubble, J.,Enzyme Microl.Technol(2001) 29,28-38.
  9. Nakamura, T., Kawasaki, M., Matsamoto, K., Tannand, S Kchand enkyu, (2003) 16, 57-62.
  10. Bhargava, D.S and Sheldarkar, S.B.,Research,(1992) 27,303-312.
  11. Shivani Bharwaj and Mukhar, A. Khan,IndianJ. Chem. Tech.,(2004) 11, 1256-1240.
  12. Woon, Sin, Ahn, Kwangsoonlee and Hyuntai kwak,Journal of Korean chemical society
  13. Mingtingxu and E. IglesiaJ. Phy. chem., B.(1998) 102, 961-965.
  14. Net Pradit, S., Thiravetyan, P. and Towprayoon,S.,水Res.,(2003) 37, 945-952.
  15. Chitin G.Annaadurai, M.Chellapandian and KrishananEnvironmental monitoring andassessment(1999) 59(1), 23-40.