Metallic Status in and around Chopan River Raghogarh
Megha Rai1*and R.M. Shrivastava1
1Department of Chemistry, Unique College, Bhopal, 462 003 India
http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.1.19
Assessment of metals in ground water and surface water of different stations in and around Chopan river of Rahogarh, Madhya Pradesh has been carried out in the year (2004). The present work was conducted to evaluate four metals i.e. Copper, Iron, Zinc and Lead from four tube wells and six stations at Chopan river. It was found that the values of Iron metal were higher at some stations particularly near the study area i.e. Fertilizer industry.
Metalic Status; Chopan River; Raghogarh
Copy the following to cite this article:
Rai M, Shrivastava R.M. Metallic Status in and around Chopan River Raghogarh. Curr World Environ 2006;1(1):91-93 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.1.19
Copy the following to cite this URL:
Rai M, Shrivastava R.M. Metallic Status in and around Chopan River Raghogarh. Curr World Environ 2006;1(1):91-93. Available from://www.a-i-l-s-a.com/?p=539
Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History
Introduction
Heavy metals are those having a density more than five times higher than that of water. These metals are now a day the environmental pollutants of major concern,1and is due to the basic fact that metals are not biodegradable or perishable. Metals are released into environment by anthropogenic activities, such as burning of fossil fuels, discharge of industrial effluents, mining and such other action leads to the development of its toxicity in water.
这个不利的alteration in the surrounding generate pollutants, which can cause various problems like itai-itai disease, anaemia etc.
In the present study a spectrophotometer analysis of the metals at six stations on Chopan river and four tube wells within the radius of about 10km from fertilizer industry has been carried out.
The metals like Copper, Iron, Zinc and lead were analyzed. The objective of the present work was to determine the quality of water supplied to rural community in order to estimate the health implication and to maintain the aquatic biota.
Material and Methods
Water samples were collected for three seasons i.e. summer, Rainy and winter. Samples with in the 10 km from Fertilizers industry were collected from ten points, out of these 10 points, four are tube wells and six stations are on Chopan River.
All the samples were collected in polythene bottles for analysis. In the present study metal analysis has been carried out by atomic absorption Spectrophotometer at different wavelengths.
Before measurement the instruments were calibrated for particular element, thereafter the samples were run for particular element. The instrument gives the reading directly in mg/l.
Results and Discussion
Heavy metals like Copper in trace amount is required by living organisms for various enzymatic reactions but excessive concentrations may cause poisonous. It also has a property to substitute the position of other metals in the body when absorbed in excess. It inhibits the absorption of zinc, which may cause abnormal foetal growth.
Table - 1: Seasonal metal analysis offour Tube Wells (2004)
| Copper | Iron | Zinc | Lead | ||
| GT1 | S | ND | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.053 |
| R | ND | 0.18 | 0.09 | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.04 | 0.02 | ND | |
| GT2 | S | ND | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.03 |
| R | ND | 0.46 | 0.98 | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.35 | 0.84 | ND | |
| GT3 | S | ND | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
| R | ND | 0.21 | 0.4 | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.21 | 0.25 | ND | |
| GT4 | S | ND | 2.22 | 0.46 | 0.016 |
| R | ND | 1.16 | 0.18 | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.32 | 0.1 | ND |
The desirable limit is 0.05 mg/l. In the present study Copper was below the detection limit in tube well as well as in river water. All kinds of water contain appreciable amount of iron. It is one of the most abundant elements of the rocks and soil. Desirable limit is 0.3 mg/l. and maximum 1.0 mg/l was fixed for drinking water (IS: 10500). In the present study iron content in tube wells were ranged from nil to 2.22 mg/l. Iron content was found to be lowest in winter seasons and maximum in the summer season. Station GT 2 showed higher value of Iron content throughout the year, while Iron at other stations is within permissible limits. In case of Chopan River it was ranged from nil to 0.5 mg/l. during the year 2004.
Presence of lead in water showed adverse effect on various physiological process of living organisms. Excessive concentration causes lead poisoning. Indian 2 Council for Medical research fixed the maximum permissible limit of 0.1 mg/1. for drinking water.
In the study period the lead content in the range of nil to 0.084 mg/1. was recorded in tube well whereas in the river water it was below detection limit. Heavy metals like Zinc, is one of the vital elements needed in trace amount for various metabolic activity of plants and animals. It is a component of metalloenzyme in the body, it is involved in the synthesis of DNA and RNA and is required for normal foetal growth. But in excess caused toxic effect.
Table - 2: Seasonal metal analysis of four Chopan rivers (2004)
| Copper | Iron | Zinc | Lead | ||
| R1 | S | ND | 0.24 | 0.068 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.06 | 0.015 | ND | |
| R2 | S | ND | 0.3 | 0.075 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.07 | 0.03 | ND | |
| R3 | S | ND | 0.35 | 0.04 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.15 | 0.04 | ND | |
| R4 | S | ND | 0.3 | 0.1 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.1 | 0.03 | ND | |
| R5 | S | ND | 0.25 | 0.09 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.12 | 0.03 | ND | |
| R6 | S | ND | 0.2 | 0.062 | ND |
| R | ND | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| W | ND | 0.12 | 0.03 | ND |
In the present study, in tube wells it was ranged from 0.09 mg/l. to 1.3 mg/l. Whereas in case of Chopan river it was ranged in between 0.015 mg/l to below detection limit.
Conclusion
The assessment of water samples from different sources by various methods shows that few water samples are good for drinking as well as domestic purpose. However in the study area a few water samples particularly nearby fertilizer industry are undesirable for drinking based on 3,4 Fe and Zn content. The awareness regarding prevention against diseases is necessary among villagers. Continuous monitoring is required for safe drinking water purpose.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Department of Chemistry, Unique College, Bhopal for providing the necessary laboratory facilities and helpful suggestion for this work.
References
- Patil P.R., Shrivastava V.S., Metallic of River Godavari a Statistical approach.Ind. J. Envir.Prot.(2003) 23(6), 650-653.
- ICMR, Manual of standards for quality of drinking water supplies (1975).
- Krishna Deo JHA, N.N.Jha, A Kumar and J.K. Yadav., Studies on physico-chemical characteristics of lentic and tolic water bodies of river Mahananda at Jhaua, Katihar (Bihar) (2004) 16(2) 1234-1236.
- WHO, International Standard for Drinking Water, Geneva (1971).
- Pandey B.N., Shyama Nand, Quality of ground water in rural areas of Kosi-Zone,Bihar. Envir. Ecol.(2003) 21(4), 897-902
- Meitei N.S., Patil P.M., Bhosle A.B. Physico-chemical analysis of Purana river for potablity.J. Aqua Biol.(2004) 19(1),103-105.
- Singh M., Gupta K.C. Physico-chemical studies of water of river Yammuna at Mathura.Asian. J. Chem.(2003) 15(3-4) 1603-06.
- Biswas S.N., H. Mohabey and M.L Naik “Studies on Fluoride and other Trace elements content in Domestic water sources of Chandidongri Fluoride Mine area of Dist. Rajnandgaon, Chattisgarh (India)Asian. J.化学。(2004) 16(3-4), 1856-1862.
