Current World Environment

Introduction

Pesticides used to protect crops have led to increased crop yield in the modern world. However, unscientific use of various types of pesticides as affected various forms of life in the environment directly and indirectly. Persistent Organochlorine Pesticide (OCPs) has been applied continuously in the last century to improve the agricultural productivity. These OCPs being persistent organic pollutants and their metabolites are still present in the environments which are having mutagenic and carcinogenic effects.¹

Endosulfan (6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9-methano-2,4,3-benzodio-3-oxide) is first generation Organochlorine pesticide introduced in 1950’s and approved for use in 1954 in USA. It exists in two isomers as α-Endosulfan or Endosulfan (I) and β-Endosulfan or Endosulfan (II) in the ratio 7:3 having almost similar insecticidal activities, but have significant differences with respect to their physicochemical properties.^2-4It is a broad spectrum insecticide used on fruit, vegetables, cotton and Ornamental plants to control white flies, aphids, leafhoppers, potato beetles, moth larvae and cabbage worms.⁵Endosulfan and its toxic residue endosulfan sulfate are known for Bioaccumulation which can get into the food chain in many ways. The two isomers and other metabolites of endosulfan are shown in the Fig.1.

Figure 1: Structure of endosulfan isomers and its major metabolites Click here to View figure

Endosulfan is listed in persistent organic pollutants (POPs) by Stockholm convention in 2011, because of its high toxicity and bioaccumulative nature to most living organisms and was demonstrated to transport from its original source to long distance in the environment, affecting remote human and wildlife population through mammalian gonadal toxicity, genotoxicity and neurotoxicity.^6-7India was a supplier of 70% endosulfan of a market value around $300 million and was the largest consumer of it by consuming 9,000 tonnes every year by its 75 million farmers, making it has world’s largest consumer. Due to its toxicity to humans and other non target organisms, it has been banned in India since 2011 for its production, use & sale, all over India. Due to its Hydrophobic, persistent and bioaccumable nature, the endosulfan strongly bounds to soil and their residues will remain in soil for longer periods.⁸Earlier studies have shown the presence of Endosulfan isomers and endosulfan sulfate in various agricultural soils, water and other environmental samples in India and around the world.^9-13These findings show the contamination of various environmental samples with endosulfan and its metabolites along with other pesticides.

Endosulfan was applied onto cashew trees to protect them from mosquito bug in many villages of Puttur, Belthangady, Sullia and Bantwal Taluks of Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka, India. More than thirty six thousand liters of endosulfan was aerially applied in eight fifty (850) hectares of cashew plantations in the District and also with addition of eleven thousand liters by manual application according to Karnataka cashew development corporation ltd from the year 1980-2000. The applied insecticide remains in soil for longer periods. The half-life of endosulfan is considered more than hundred years.¹⁴

Bioremediation or Bioaugmentation is an ecofriendly method in removing the toxic contaminants using microorganisms. Some of the studies which have reported on biodegradation of endosulfan by using microorganisms are.^15-23Bacteria and fungi are considered as a potential candidate in removing contaminants has they use it for their metabolism.²⁴Indigenous Bacteria and fungi capable of removing toxicants from contaminated soils acts as an excellent bioaugmenting agent and also they do not pose any serious threat to other native flora and fauna.²⁵In this regard, the present study was carried out to isolate indigenous bacteria capable of degradingendosulfan completely.

Materials and methods

Soil sampling

The soil samples were collected from cashew plantations of Kokkada, Patrame and Nidle villages in Belthangady Taluk of Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka were the soils were exposed to endosulfan for decades.The soil samples were collected from different sites of the same field of cashew plantation (Fig.2.). The collected soil samples were kept in labeled polythene covers and brought to laboratory for experimental analysis. Then, the samples were air dried, sieved through a 2mm mesh and stored at 4⁰C until further use. The basic soil characteristics are shown in the Table 1.

Chemicals

Analytical grade α- Endosulfan (99.6%) and β- Endosulfan (99.8%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA and were used as standard. Stock solution (100 ppm) of each isomer was separately prepared in HPLC graden-Hexane by weighing approximately 1 mg (Acculab ALC210.4) of the analyte into a 10 ml volumetric flask and diluting into a volume. Stock standard solutions were stored in the dark at -20⁰C. Working solutions were prepared as and when required²⁶.

Figure 2: Map showing endosulfan sampling location in Dakshina Kannadadistrict, Karnataka, India (地图不是per scale). Click here to View figure

Table 1: Basic soil characteristics of samples collected from endosulfan contaminated sites.

Enrichment and isolation of endosulfan degrading bacterial strain

For isolation, 1g of soil sample collected from endosulfan contaminated sites of cashew plantations of Dakshina Kannada District, was inoculated into 250ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 ml of Non sulfur Medium (NSM) of composition (g/l) K₂HPO₄0.225g, KH₂PO₄0.225g, NH₄Cl 0.225g, MgCl₂.6H₂O 0.845g, CaCO₃0.005g, FeCl₂.4H₂O 0.005, D-glucose 1.0gm and 1ml trace element solution of (mg/l) MnCl₂.4H₂O 198mg, ZnCl₂136mg, CuCl₂.2H₂O 171mg, CoCl₂.6H₂O 24mg, NiCl₂.6H₂O 24mg^[27]along with 100mg/l endosulfan as sole carbon source at pH 7.5, and kept for incubation at 120 rpm in shaker at 37⁰C for 7 days. After 7 days of incubation, 1ml of sample was reinoculated into 100ml fresh media with 100 mg/lendosulfan. After fourth enrichment, the sample was spread plated on plates of mineral medium (1.5% agar) with 100mg/l endosulfan. The pure, potent strain isolated was characterized morphologically and biochemically and compared with Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology²⁸.

Biodegradation Studies

The pure potent strain showing luxury growth on NSM agar plate designated as ES-1 was selected for biodegradation of endosulfan isomers. For this, 250ml flask containing 100ml of NSM medium was inoculated with cell pellets of strain ES-1 (10 ml of overnight culture was taken in 15 ml centrifuge tube and was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the supernatant was discarded and cell pellets was dissolved with 1 ml of sterile NSM medium and added into the flask aseptically) along with 70 mg/l of α isomer and 30 mg/l of β isomer and incubated at 37 The extraction of insecticide from the medium was carried out according to²⁹with slight modification. After 7 days of incubation, 35ml of liquid media was taken in 50ml centrifuge tube. The tube was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5min and supernatant was separated by separate flask using petroleum ether by shake flask method. Then, organic aqueous layer was passed through (~2 gm) anhydrous magnesium sulphate. Later the solution was concentrated by rotary evaporator (Bucchi type, GG Technologies, India). Similarly, after 14 days of incubation, the sample was extracted by same procedure. The residue was then dissolved in HPLC grade n-Hexane and was analyzed through Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS).

Optimum Degradation studies

硫丹的圣最佳降解条件rain ES-1 was carried out according to³⁰with slight modification. The degradation studies were carried out with different temperature (37 & 55⁰C) and with different concentration of endosulfan (100, 250 & 500 mg/l).All the experiments were carried out in 250ml flasks containing NSM media with endosulfan as the sole carbon source. The pH of the medium was checked at the end of 14^thday. The experiments were carried out in triplicates along with control. The extraction was carried out according to protocol mentioned above.

Microcosm studies on degradation of Endosulfan in soil

For soil microcosm studies, soil samples were collected from Mysore University campus, which didn’t had any application of pesticides previously. The collected samples were sieved by 2 mm mesh to remove debris. Then, 100 gm of soil samples were placed in 250 ml Erlenmyer flasks and autoclaved at 121⁰C for 20 min. The procedure was repeated thrice so that, soil is free from all other microorganisms. Later, the soil samples were spiked with 100 mg kg^-1of endosulfan and inoculated with cell pellets containing 10⁶cells gm^-1ofBacillussp. ES-1. Similarly control flasks were kept without the addition of cell culture. The flasks were kept for incubation for 7-14 days. The flasks were moistened at regular intervals by adding 10 ml of sterile water. The residues were then extracted according to¹by shake flask method. 10 g of soil was taken in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask and 50 ml of petroleum ether and acetone (1:1, v/v) was added and kept in horizontal shaker for overnight. Later, the extracts were filtered and kept for evaporation for dryness in a beaker. Later, the residues were dissolved in 1ml of HPLC grade n-hexane and were analyzed by GC-MS.

Residue analysis

GC-MS analysis was carried out on 7890A GC systems (Agilent Technologies, inc) linked to Mass spectroscopy of Synapt G2 HPMS MS (Waters, USA) equipped with Electron spray ionization (ESI) detector. The GC column consisted with HP-5MS capillary column of 30m x 0.250mm (Agilent Technologies, inc). The GC-MS was programmed according to.³¹The oven temperature was programmed to increase from 120⁰C to 320⁰C at 10⁰C min^-1. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 ev using full scan mode. The qualitative analysis of endosulfan present in the samples was monitored by comparing retention time with respect to internal standard. Recovery study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of above said procedure. The average recovery for both endosulfan isomers was found to be 93% and 91.2% for α and β endosulfan respectively.

Identification of Strain ES-1 (DNA Isolation& 16S rDNA amplification)

DNA was isolated from the strain according to³²The amplification of 16S rDNA gene of strain was carried out using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) according to³³, by forward (BS F: GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCA GG) and reverse (BS R: TCATCTGTCCCACCTTCGGC). The DNA sequences were analyzed with the Internet BLAST Gene database (http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and the sequence was submitted to GenBank. Later, the partial sequenced data was submitted to Genbank and accession number KX230063 was obtained.

Results and Discussion

Isolation of endosulfan degrading bacterial isolate

The soil enrichment method adopted for isolating microbial culture resulted in isolation of bacterial strain which could tolerate high concentration of endosulfan. Out of three village samples, we were able to isolate bacteria from only Patrame village. After repeated successive sub-culturing in enrichment medium, microbial isolate designated as ES-1 showed substantial growth there by indicating the utilization of endosulfan as the growth substrate.

Identification of ES-1

ES-1 was identified as gram-positive facultative anaerobicBacillishaped (Fig.3.), non-motile, Catalase positive, and exhibited creamish white colony morphology on NSM agar with endosulfan. The DNA isolated was subjected to PCR amplification. Based on 16s rDNA sequence the bacterium was identified asBacillussp.The Phylogenetic tree constructed using neighbor joining method using Mega software showed strainES-1 (KX230063) 99% query cover withBacillus thermoamylovorans(KJ842641) (Fig.4.). However, other molecular evidence is to be studied further to conclude the strain ES-1 asBacillus thermoamylovorans.

Figure 3: Microscopic images of bacterial isolate ES-1 observed under Light Microscope (Allwin Scientifics), India [oil immersion (100X)] Click here to View figure

Biodegradation of Endosulfan using Bacterial Isolate ES-1

Biodegradation of Endosulfan using bacterial isolate ES-1Degradation of endosulfan isomers (α & β) was assessed using bacterial strain ES-1.GC-MS analysis revealed that, after 14 days of incubation the strain ES-1 was able to metabolize endosulfan completely without formation of any known intermediates. The result is based on comparative analysis of total number of peaks obtained by GC-MS Chromatogram. , (Fig.5a.).Chromatograph ‘a’represents Total Ion Chromatograph of standard endosulfan with retention time of 11.21 for α-endosulfan and 11.74 for β-endosulfan with m/z 406 (Fig.5b.). Chromatograph ‘c’ (Fig.5c.) represents sample taken from flask after 14 days incubation with m/z 390.

Figure 4: Phylogenetic tree constructed using 16S rDNA partial sequencecomparing with strains from GenBank with highestsimilarities (accession numbers in parentheses). Click here to View figure

In Mineral medium with endosulfan as sulfur source, the organism capable of removing sulfite group and use it as sulfur source will survive and reproduce.³⁰It also results in reducing the toxicity of compound which helps in detoxification of the compound. Microbial degradation of endosulfan isomers by various bacterial and fungal isolates in aerobic condition have been studied vastly. Endosulfan sulfate, endosulfan diol, endosulfan ether, endosulfan hydroxyether, endosulfan lactone, endosulfan monoaldehyde and endosulfan dialdehyde have been reported as the major metabolites formed during the microbial degradation of endosulfan isomers.^23,34Both these analyses strongly support the complete degradation of endosulfan by ES-1strain.

The Optimum biodegradation studies revealed that, the strain showed excellent growth at temperature 55⁰C, than at 37⁰C (Data not shown). The result revealed that, theBacillussp. ES-1 is a thermophilic bacteria surviving in acidic soil. The strain, ES-1 showed maximum degradation of >90% at 100 mg/l (Fig.5.) and was an efficient biodegrader of endosulfan provided at same concentration. The pH of the medium was reduced to acidic after 14 days of incubation (Table-2). The decrease in pH was observed more in 100 mg/l concentration than in 250 and 500 mg/l of endosulfan. The decrease in pH to acidic from neutral during endosulfan degradation was also observed by many other researchers.^{6, 35}This is may be due to increased metabolic activity resulting in formation of acidic metabolites.

Figure 5a: GC-MS, Total Ion chromatograms (TIC) of standard α and β endosulfan b. Mass spectra of Endosulfan c) Mass fragmentation of metabolites obtained after 14 days Click here to View figure

The strainBacillussp. ES-1 followed hydrolytic pathway for biodegradation without formation of any known metabolites. These results revealed that the strain ES-1 adopted the hydrolytic pathway for endosulfan biodegradation,³⁶contrary to oxidative pathway of endosulfan biodegradation in which endosulfan sulfate is formed.^37-39The absence of any particular metabolite accumulation in the culture media during the course of degradation could suggest a possible complete mineralization of endosulfan through formation of some polar metabolites. Similarly, no metabolites were observed by during endosulfan degradation byAgrobacterium tumefaciensPT-3 suggesting possibility of utilizing insecticide as a carbon source by unique sets of genes and enzymes.²⁰AchromobacterxyloxidansC8B was also able to mineralize isomers of endosulfan and Endosulfan sulfate provided at concentration of 50 ppm up to 20^thday incubation in liquid media.³⁰Complete mineralization of endosulfan by the bacterial strainsStaphylococcussp.,Bacillus circulansI and II had been studied.These strains were found to be excellent degrader of endosulfan and its metabolites. The Mineralization of insecticide may harbor hydrolysis pathway resulting in formation of carbenium ions or ethyl carboxylates which will later convert into simple hydrocarbons.⁴⁰

Figure 6: Growth condition of strain ES-1 in NSM with different concentration of endosulfan Click here to View figure

Table 2: Decrease in pH was observed after 14 days of Incubation (Initial pH 7).

Biodegradation capability ofBacillussp.ES-1 strain in soil for both α and β isomers (100 mg/kg) of endosulfan was assessed. The isolate was able to degrade 50% of compound in 7 days and complete mineralization was observed after 14 days. No accumulated product was detected.Whereas control flask extract showed both the isomers along withm/zof 423 corresponding to mass of endosulfan sulfate. This clearly explains that the strain followed hydrolytic pathway in mineralization of endosulfan. Under abiotic condition, the compound oxidized it into endosulfan sulfate. The previous studies have shown that, by hydrolysis both the isomers get hydrolyzed into endosulfan ether and diol²⁷and endosulfan sulfate through oxidation⁴¹. The mixed bacterial consortium was able to mineralize isomers of endosulfan without formation of any known intermediate metabolites⁴⁰contrast to this; endosulfan sulfate was formed byBacillussp.⁴².Microbial strains capable of removing insecticides without formation of toxic byproducts should be implemented in bioaugmentation or bioremediation than the strains forming toxic byproducts⁴³. The results from present work revealed that, the isolate ES-1 hydrolyzed both the isomers of endosulfan completely without formation any toxic byproducts. Hence, it acts as an excellent bioaugmenting agent. theBacillussp ES-1 may harbor enzymes in degrading both the isomers which needs to be studied further.

Conclusion

Endosulfan isomers and endosulfan sulfate being toxic to humans and the environment, persists in soil for longer period. The indigenous bacterial strainBacillussp.ES-1 was found to degrade endosulfan completely. Endosulfan sulfate, an intermediate compound usually accumulates during the course of degradation, which is generally considered as more toxic and persistent than the parent compound was not detected. From these results, we conclude that, The indigenous strain ES-1 could be used as bioaugmenting agent to decontaminate the soil contaminated with high concentration of endosulfan.

Acknowledgment

作者感谢部门的科学和技术logy (DST)-Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India, for grant received (SB/EMEQ-041/2013) to carry out this work and Institution of Excellence (IOE), University of Mysore, Mysuru, for providing Gas Chromatography-Mass spectroscopy (GC-MS).

References

1. Ozcan, S., Tor, A., Aydin, M. E. Analytical Methods for Viable and Rapid Determination of Organochlorine Pesticides in Water and Soil Samples, Pesticides - Strategies for Pesticides Analysis.InTech,59-82 (2011)
2. Unites States- Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA),. Endosulfan RED facts. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registration/REDs/factsheet/endosulfan_fs.htm (2002) (Nov.6, 2014).
3. 詹宁斯,A。,z住宅表层土壤guidance applied worldwide to the pesticides added to the Stockholm Convention in 2009 and 2011.Journal of Environmental Management,160(10):226-240(2015)
   CrossRef
4. Schmidt, W. F., Bilboulian, S., Rice, C. P., Fettinger, J. C., McConnell, L. L., Hapemann, C. J. Thermodynamic, spectroscopic, and computational evidence for the irreversible conversion of β- to α-endosulfan.Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry,49(11):5372–5376(2001)
   CrossRef
5. Agency for Toxic Substances and Diseases Registry (ASTDR) Draft Toxicology profile for Endosulfan. http://www.atsdr.cdc.goc/toxprofiles/tp41.pdf (2013) (Nov. 7, 2014).
6. Siddique, T., Okeke, B. C., Arshad, M., Frankenberger, W. T. Enrichment and Isolation of Endosulfan-Degrading Microorganisms.Journal of Environmental Quality,32(1):47-54(2003)
   CrossRef
7. Xiong, B. W. F., Zhou, A., Zheng, G., Zhang, J., Xu, W. Photocatalyic degradation of endosulfan in contaminated soil with the elution of surfactants.Journal of Soils and Sediments,15(9):1909-1918(2015)
   CrossRef
8. Andreu, V., Pico, Y. Determination of pesticides and their degradation products in soil: critical review and comparison of methods.Trends in Analytical Chemistry,23(10-11):772–89(2004)
   CrossRef
9. Jia, H., Sun, Y., Li, Y. F., Tian, C., Wang, D., Yang, M., Ding, Y., Ma, J. Endosulfan in China 2-emissions and residues.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,16(3): 302-311 (2009).
   CrossRef
10. Jayashree, R., Vasudevan, N. Organochlorine pesticide residues in ground water of Thiruvallur District, India.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,128(1):209-215(2007)
    CrossRef
11. Zhao, Z., Zeng, H., Wu, J., Lu, Zhang. Organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in mountain soils from Tajikistan.Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts,15(3):608(2013)
    CrossRef
12. Halse, A. K., Schlabach, M., Schuster, J. K., Jones, K. C., Steinnes, E., Breivik, K. Endosulfan, pentachlorobenzene and short-chain chlorinated paraffins in background soils from Western Europe.Environmental Pollution,196(1),21-28(2014)
13. Mawussi, G., Scorza Junior, R. P., Dossa, E. L., AkoueteAlate, A. Insecticide residues in soil and water in coastal areas of vegetable production in Togo.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,186(11):7379-7385(2014)
    CrossRef
14. Odukkathil, G., Vasudevan, N. Residues of endosulfan in surface and subsurface agricultural soil and its bioremediation.Journal of Environmental Management,165(1):72-80(2016)
    CrossRef
15. Arshad, M., Hussain, S., Saleem, M. Optimization of environmental parameters for biodegradation of alpha and beta endosulfan in soil slurry byPseudomonas aeruginosa.Journal of Applied Microbiology,104(2):364-370(2007)
    CrossRef
16. Kumar, M., Lakshmi, C. V., Khanna, S. Biodegradation and bioremediation of endosulfan contaminated soil.Bioresource Technology,99(8):3116-3122(2007)
    CrossRef
17. Bajaj, A., Pathak, A., Mudiam, M. R., Mayilraj, S., Manickam, N. Isolation and characterization ofPseudomonasstrain IITR01 capable of degrading α-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate.Journal of Applied Microbiology,109(6):2135-2143(2010)
    CrossRef
18. S Kalyani,沙玛,J。,辛格,年代,Dureja, P。Lata. Enrichment and isolation of endosulfan-degrading microorganism from tropical soil.Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B,44(7):663-672(2009)
    CrossRef
19. Kumar, A., Bhoot, N., Soni, I., John, P. J. Isolation and characterization of aBacillus subtilisstrain that degrades endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate.3 Biotech,4(5):467-475(2014)
20. Thangadurai, P., Suresh, S. Biodegradation of endosulfan by soil bacterial cultures.International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,94(4):38-47(2014)
    CrossRef
21. Kumari, M., Ghosh, P., Swati., Thakur, I. S. Microcosmic study of endosulfan degradation byPaenibacillusISTP10 and its toxicological evaluation using mammalian cell lines.International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,96(7):33-40 (2014)
    CrossRef
22. Singh, M., Singh, D. K. Biodegradation of Endosulfan in Broth Medium and in Soil Microcosm byKlebsiellaM3. Bull Environ ContamToxicol,92(2):237-242(2014)
    CrossRef
23. Abraham, J., Silambarasan, S. Biomineralization and formulation of endosulfan degrading bacterial and fungal consortiums.Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,116(6):24-31(2014)
    CrossRef
24. Singh, D. K.Biodegradation and bioremediation of pesticide in soil: concept, method and recent developments.Indian J. Microbiol,48(1):35–40(2008)
    CrossRef
25. Supreeth, M., Raju, N. S. Bio-mineralization of Organophosphorous Insecticide-Chlorpyrifos and its Hydrolyzed product 3,5,6-Trichloro-2- Pyridinol byStaphylococcusES-2.Current World Environment,11(2):486-491(2016)
    CrossRef
26. Swarnam基于,a . V, t·P。Gnanasambandan, S。Status and effect of pesticide residues in soils under different land uses of Andaman Islands, India.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,185(10):8135-8145(2013)
    CrossRef
27. Hussain, S., Arshad, M., Saleem, M., Khalid, A. Biodegradation of α- and β-endosulfan by soil bacteria.Biodegradation,18(6):731-740(2007)
    CrossRef
28. Vos, PD., Garrity, GM., Joned, D., Krieg, NR., Ludwig, W., Rainey FA., Schleifer, KH., Whitman WB. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2^ndedition, Vol.3. Springer (2009)
29. Supreeth, M., Chandrashekar, M. A., Sachin, N., Raju, N. S. Effect of chlorpyrifos on soil microbial diversity and its biotransformation byStreptomycesHP-11.3 Biotech, 6:147(2016)
30. Singh, N. S., Singh, D. K. Biodegradation of endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate byAchromobacter xylosoxidansstrain C8B in broth medium.Biodegradation,22(5):845-857(2011)
    CrossRef
31. Kamei, I., Takagi, K., Kondo, R. Degradation of endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate by white-rot fungusTrametes hirsute. Journal of Wood Science,57:317-322 (2011)
    CrossRef
32. Mora, D., Fortina, M. G., Parini, C., Daffonchio, D., Manachini, P. L. Genomic subpopulations within the speciesPediococcus acidilacticidetected by multilocus typing analysis: relationship between pediocin AcHPA-1 producing and non-producing strains.Microbiology, 146:2027–2038(2000)
    CrossRef
33. Raghavendra, P., Halami, P. M. Screening, Selection and characterization of phytic acid degrading lactic acid bacteria from chicken intestine and their probiotic properties.Int J Food Microbiol,133(1-2):129–134(2009)
    CrossRef
34. Rivero, A., Niell, S., Cesio, V., PiaCerdeiras, P., Heinzen, H. Analytical methodology for the study of endosulfan bioremediation under controlled conditions with white rot fungi.Journal of Chromatography B,907:168-172 (2012)
    CrossRef
35. Bhalerao, T. S. Bioremediation of endosulfan-contaminated soil by using bioaugmentation treatment of fungal inoculantsAspergillus niger.Turk J Biol, 36:561-567(2012)
36. Kim, Y. K., Kim, S. H., Choi, S. C. Kinetics of endosulfan degradation byPhanerochaete chroysosporium.Biotechnology letters,23(2):163-166(2001)
    CrossRef
37. Kullman, S. W., Matsumura, F. Metabolic Pathways Utilized byPhanerochaete chrysosporiumfor Degradation of the Cyclodiene Pesticide Endosulfan.Applied and Environmental Microbiology,62(16):593-600(1996)
38. Kwon, G. S., Shone, H., Shin, K. S., EungbinkimSeo, B. Biodegradation of the organochlorine insecticide, endosulfan and the toxic metabolite, endosulfan sulphate byKlebsiella oxymoraKE-8.Appl Microbial Biotechnology,67(6):845-850 (2005)
    CrossRef
39. Odukkathil, G., Vasudevan, N. Enhanced biodegradation of endosulfan and its major metabolite endosulfate by a biosurfactant producing bacterium.Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B,48(6):462-469(2013)
    CrossRef
40. Kumar, M., Philip, L. Bioremediation of endosulfan contaminated soil and water-Optimization of operating conditions in laboratory scale reactors.Journal of Hazardous Materials B,136(2):354-364(2006)
    CrossRef
41. Kwon, G. S., Kim, J. E., Kim, T. K., Sohn, H. Y., Koh, S. C., Shin, K. S., Kim, D. G.Klebsiella pneumoniaKE-1 degrades endosulfan without formation of the toxic metabolite, endosulfan sulfate.FEMS MicrobiolLett,215(2):225-259(2002)
    CrossRef
42. Shivaramaiah, H. M., Kennedy, I. R. Biodegradation of Endosulfan by a Soil Bacterium.Journal of Environmental Science and Health,Part B,41(6):895-905(2006)
    CrossRef
43. Supreeth, M., Raju, N. S. Biotransformation of chlorpyrifos and endosulfan by bacteria and fungi.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(15):5961-5971(2017)
    CrossRef